methodEnglish

Allocation, utilization, and binding constraints

Trace each selected initiative to resource-period demand, remaining slack, binding cells, and violated rules.

EnglishEspaƱolFranƧais

Documentation follows the current system language. Missing translations fall back to the page's canonical language.

Allocation, utilization, and binding constraints

Read allocation by resource and period, never as one blended capacity number. For each cell, compare effective capacity, selected demand, slack, and utilization. A binding constraint has no material remaining slack and may explain why a high-scoring initiative was displaced. Over-capacity, missing-data, dependency, exclusion, or category issues require correction before decision use.

Utilization alone is not success. One resource can show spare capacity while a different crew, permit window, facility, or period blocks the portfolio. Likewise, 100% utilization may be operationally fragile when estimates are uncertain. Preserve deliberate reserve and contingency capacity instead of automatically treating every unused unit as waste.

Investigate displaced candidates and marginal trade-offs: what resource-period cells would they consume, what dependencies would enter with them, and what selected work would need to leave? Do not infer causality from a dashboard color; use the engine’s binding constraints and the recorded model relationships.

Next: trade-offs, frontier, and sensitivity.

References

PMI — The Standard for Portfolio Management, Fourth Edition

Portfolio-management guidance connecting strategy, component selection, resource supply and demand, value, and governance.

https://www.pmi.org/standards/for-portfolio-management