methodEnglish

Quantitative Risk & Contingency Analysis Workbench

Model cost and schedule uncertainty with traceable ranges, discrete risk events, correlations, and reproducible Monte Carlo simulation; derive percentile-based contingency and expose the assumptions and drivers behind the tail without treating a modeled confidence level as an authorized reserve.

EnglishEspañolFrançais

Documentation follows the current system language. Missing translations fall back to the page's canonical language.

Quantitative Risk & Contingency Analysis

Use this workbench when a bounded project or program needs a defensible distribution of final cost, completion duration, or both. It connects an unrisked baseline, base-estimate uncertainty, discrete threats and opportunities, dependencies, scenarios, evidence, and an explicit contingency policy to a reproducible Monte Carlo run.

The workbench can answer what P50, P80, P90, or another declared percentile means under the recorded model; how much contingency or schedule reserve separates that percentile from the unrisked baseline; the modeled confidence at a human-entered budget or deadline; and which inputs are associated with the upper tail. It cannot guarantee an outcome, approve funds, replace a resource-loaded schedule, or manufacture precision from weak evidence.

Traceable uncertainty-to-decision cycle

Simulation is one controlled step in a repeatable review cycle; it does not replace evidence, validation, or authorization.

Core boundary

Base uncertainty exists even when no named event occurs. A discrete event has a probability of occurrence and a non-negative impact magnitude: threats add and opportunities subtract. Existing contingency, escalation, allowances, and management reserve remain separate comparison inputs; none belongs inside the unrisked baseline. Inherent and residual profiles are independent claims, and residual exposure requires an explicit response, owner, status, and rationale.

Use the qualitative Risk & Assumption Stress Test when credible numerical ranges are unavailable; a Decision Tree for sequential choices and learning; Scenario Planning for deep uncertainty; Project Viability for cash-flow sustainability; or Portfolio & Resource Allocation for choosing a feasible mix of initiatives.

Choose the right uncertainty method

Supportable ranges can form a cost or duration distribution

Quantitative Risk & Contingency · Use when

A percentile guarantees delivery or authorizes reserve

Quantitative Risk & Contingency · Do not claim

Evidence is mainly qualitative or ordinal

Risk & Assumption Stress Test · Use when

Ordinal exposure is a monetary contingency

Risk & Assumption Stress Test · Do not claim

Choices and information arrive sequentially

Decision Tree & Learning Value · Use when

A tree is an aggregate project-risk distribution

Decision Tree & Learning Value · Do not claim

Deep uncertainty makes precise probabilities misleading

Scenario Planning · Use when

A plausible future has an objective probability

Scenario Planning · Do not claim

Quantitative risk analysis produces bounded cost or duration distributions; adjacent methods answer different decision questions.

Begin with selection and framing, then progress through the pages in order. ## Interpretation discipline

Keep inputs, derived results, and human decisions visibly separate. Every material number needs linked evidence or an explicit assumption flag and basis. Unknown is not zero. A percentile is conditional on this model, scenario, seed, engine version, and source version; it is neither a guarantee nor an approval. Any material model edit makes an earlier result stale.

References

FHWA — Major Project Program Cost Estimating Guidance

Federal guidance for preparing, reviewing, documenting, and updating major-project cost estimates and uncertainty analysis.

https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/majorprojects/cost_estimating/guidance.cfm

FHWA — Contingency Fund Management

Guidance distinguishing contingency analysis from the governance, monitoring, and controlled use of contingency funds.

https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/majorprojects/financial_plans/contingency_fund.cfm

GAO Cost Estimating and Assessment Guide (GAO-20-195G)

A reference for credible cost estimates, risk and uncertainty analysis, sensitivity, documentation, and management review.

https://www.gao.gov/assets/710/706933.pdf

NASA — Program Planning and Control Guidance Documents

Official cost-estimating guidance, including material on cost-risk analysis, distributions, correlation, and joint confidence levels.

https://www.nasa.gov/ocfo/ppc-corner/ppc-guidance-documents/

U.S. Department of Energy — Cost Estimating Guide

Federal guidance on estimate bases, uncertainty, contingency, estimate reviews, and traceable cost-estimating practice.

https://www.energy.gov/documents/cost-estimating-guide